Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 377/2022

Case between M/s Ambikas vs M/s Harikrishnans regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M
Order Date
2024-10-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner is M/s Ambikas seeking to restore a suit that was rejected for non-payment of court fee. The respondent is M/s Harikrishnans, who opposed the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for restoration as it lacked power to restore a suit dismissed for non-payment of court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined it had no authority to restore the suit given the circumstances of its rejection.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for the said reasons, The petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Ambikas (Age not specified years) Room No:2, DD Tex World, 40/7070V, Basement Floor, Market Road, Ernakulam – 682 031

Defendants

M/s Harikrishnans (Age not specified years) West of Iron Bridge, St. Joseph Street, Alleppey – 682 001

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
However, it is to be seen that the order dated 23.09.2023 was not one of dismissing the suit for default, but rejecting the plaint for non-payment of court-fee.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases