Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 83/2023

Case between Mrs. Voliya Biju Arakkal et al vs Mr. Cyril Xavier regarding declaration and injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mrs. Voliya Biju Arakkal, is seeking a declaration of her half undivided right over a property and a permanent injunction against the defendant, Mr. Cyril Xavier, who is claiming absolute ownership. The dispute involves properties inherited from the plaintiff's father and their usage rights.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared the plaintiff's half undivided right, title, and possession over the property and granted a permanent injunction against the defendant, prohibiting any actions detrimental to the plaintiff's rights.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff's half undivided right, title and possession over the plaint C schedule property is declared and a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claim was supported by the evidence of ownership and the relevant documents establishing her rights.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: i. The plaintiff's half undivided right, title and also possession over the plaint C schedule property is declared. ii. A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed, restraining the defendant, his agents and henchmen from doing any act which is detrimental to the plaintiff's half undivided right, title, interest and possession over the plaint C schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mrs. Voliya Biju Arakkal (49 years) Valiyaparambil House, Emakulam North P.O., PIN- 682 018, Ernakulam village, Kanayannoor Taluk Mr. MICHEAL CHEGUVERA (54 years) Kachappilly House, Puthupallipram Kara, Edappally P.O., PIN – 682 024, Thrikkakara north Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Defendants

Mr. Cyril Xavier (77 years) Aravinnassery House, Chittoor Road, near E.T. North Police Station, Ernakulam North P.O., PIN – 682 018, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's half undivided right, title and possession over the plaint C schedule property declared.
Evidence:
the plaintiff's half undivided right, title and also possession over the plaint C schedule property is declared.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the plaint C schedule property.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed, restraining the defendant, his agents and henchmen from doing any act which is detrimental to the plaintiff's half undivided right.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notarized copy of the Power of Attorney representing the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No. 571/2020 establishing the plaintiff's rights.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2538/1994 related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 4588/1995 related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of Lawyer Notice sent to the defendant claiming rights over the C schedule.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of Reply Notice sent to the defendant refuting claims over the C schedule.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Document No: 2538/1994 concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Document No: 4588/1995 concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Document No: 5308/2006 concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report filed regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough Sketch appended to the Commission Report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Testimonies of PW1 and DW1 regarding the case.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases