Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 135/2021

Case between Mrs. Sheela Aby et al vs Mr. Muhammed Fazil Basheer et al regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
approximately-4 years 3 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Mrs. Sheela Aby and Dr. John Aby, seek eviction of Mr. Muhammed Fazil Basheer and M/s. AIMFIFLL INTERNATIONAL from a commercial space over unpaid rent and personal requirement. The petitioners claim the respondent has not paid rent since July 2019 and requires the premises for their dental clinic.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the petition for eviction of the respondent due to arrears of rent and bona fide personal requirement. The respondent is directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the premises within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the petition for eviction of the respondent due to arrears of rent and bona fide personal requirement. The respondent is directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship and proved that rent was in arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners established the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship and proved that rent was in arrears.
Supporting Evidence
Thus the bonafide need put forth by the petitioners remained unshaken even in cross examination of PW1. Hence, on analyzing the above facts and entire evidences available on records, this court is convinced with the bonafide need as projected by the petitioners under section 11(3) of the Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act as follows; i. The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mrs. Sheela Aby
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. John Aby
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Muhammed Fazil Basheer
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. AIMFIFLL INTERNATIONAL
Relation
Represented BY
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer’s notice dated 02.07.2021, Original postal receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanjana Sara Varghese Annie
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ninan John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arya A.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Siyad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners sought eviction of the respondent from the rented premises.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act as follows; i. The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners sought the recovery of costs incurred during the proceedings.
Evidence:
Hence, the petitioner is entitled to get the costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice informed the respondent about the demand for clearing rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The receipts serve as proof of the attempts made to send notices to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This envelope was returned unserved with endorsement 'Noticed', indicating delivery failure.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This envelope was returned as unclaimed, further demonstrating failed communication attempts.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mrs. Sheela Aby et al vs Mr. Muhammed Fazil Basheer et al regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Mrs. Sheela Aby et al vs Mr. Muhammed Fazil Basheer et al regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 05/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won