Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 172/2024

Case between Mr. Santhosh Kumar vs Mrs. Shijimol regarding rent arrears and possession of property

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Santhosh Kumar, the landlord, filed a petition against Mrs. Shijimol, the tenant, for non-payment of rent and violation of the rental agreement. The case revolves around arrears amounting to Rs. 2,70,000/- and the landlord's need for the property for personal residence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioner's request for possession of the property and ordered the respondent to vacate within 30 days. Additionally, the petitioner was awarded costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's case was established through unrebutted testimony and evidence, demonstrating the need for the property and the tenant's failure to pay rent.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. Santhosh Kumar (52 years) 204, Juma Al Majid Building, Al Karama, PO BOX No.103694 DUBAI, United Arab Emirates

Defendants

Mrs. Shijimol (36 years) JADE HEIGHTES (MIR) Flat No. (2174) 17D, Kakkanadu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kakkanadu.P.O., Ernakulam-682030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Evidence:
In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: 1.The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original power of attorney dated 01.04.2021 was presented to support the petitioner's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rental Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original rental agreement dated 07.04.2022 was filed to establish the lease terms and rent amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of the lawyer's notice dated 24.06.2024 was presented to show that demands had been made for the overdue rent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original acknowledgment card was accepted to confirm receipt of communication related to the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The Commission Report in IA 02/2024 was referenced for evidence pertaining to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 04/07/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases