Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 172/2024

Case between Mr. Santhosh Kumar vs Mrs. Shijimol regarding rent arrears and possession of property

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Santhosh Kumar, the landlord, filed a petition against Mrs. Shijimol, the tenant, for non-payment of rent and violation of the rental agreement. The case revolves around arrears amounting to Rs. 2,70,000/- and the landlord's need for the property for personal residence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioner's request for possession of the property and ordered the respondent to vacate within 30 days. Additionally, the petitioner was awarded costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the petitioner's request for possession of the property and ordered the respondent to vacate within 30 days. Additionally, the petitioner was awarded costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's case was established through unrebutted testimony and evidence, demonstrating the need for the property and the tenant's failure to pay rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner's case was established through unrebutted testimony and evidence, demonstrating the need for the property and the tenant's failure to pay rent.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A4 established his case as pleaded by him. It shows that the rent is in arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Santhosh Kumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Shijimol
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original power of attorney dated 01.04.2021, Original rental agreement dated 07.04.2022, Copy of lawyer's notice dated 24.06.2024, Original acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanel Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Athira N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roneo M. Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Evidence:
In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: 1.The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original power of attorney dated 01.04.2021 was presented to support the petitioner's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rental Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original rental agreement dated 07.04.2022 was filed to establish the lease terms and rent amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of the lawyer's notice dated 24.06.2024 was presented to show that demands had been made for the overdue rent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original acknowledgment card was accepted to confirm receipt of communication related to the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The Commission Report in IA 02/2024 was referenced for evidence pertaining to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mr. Santhosh Kumar vs Mrs. Shijimol regarding rent arrears and possession of property
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Santhosh Kumar vs Mrs. Shijimol regarding rent arrears and possession of property

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 04/07/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won