Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 133/2024

Case between Mr. N.M.Sukumaran et al vs Vishnu P.V. regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
approximately-1 year 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Mr. N.M.Sukumaran and Mrs. Vanaja Sukumaran, seek eviction of the respondent, Vishnu P.V., for non-payment of rent and arrears under a licensing agreement. Despite issuing a notice, the respondent failed to appear or respond to the allegations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and ordered the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days. Costs were also awarded to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the premises and costs awarded to the petitioners.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and ordered the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days. Costs were also awarded to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners successfully established their claim with unrebutted testimony and submitted evidence of non-payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners successfully established their claim with unrebutted testimony and submitted evidence of non-payment.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and exhibits A1 to A5 established their case as pleaded by them. It shows that the rent is in arrears from the respondent.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/sec. 11(2)(b) Act with costs as follows:- 1.The respondents/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. N.M.Sukumaran
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o late P.K.Madhavan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mrs. Vanaja Sukumaran
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o N.M.Sukumaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vishnu P.V.
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o. Vijayakosh
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Licence Deed dated 05.01.2024, Lawyer’s notice sent to respondent dated 10.05.2024, Original acknowledgment card dated 14.05.2024, Original cheque No. 026042 of Kerala Grameen Bank, Thiruvananthapuram branch dated 13.01.2024, Original cheque return memo dated 19.03.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binni Kamal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the premises due to non-payment of rent.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/sec. 11(2)(b) Act with costs as follows:- The respondents/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement of the petitioners to recover costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Licence Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the license agreement between the petitioners and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the demand for rent arrears and balance security deposit.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The bounced cheque issued by the respondent for the security deposit.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the return of the bounced cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mr. N.M.Sukumaran et al vs Vishnu P.V. regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. N.M.Sukumaran et al vs Vishnu P.V. regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/05/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won