Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.105/2019

Case between Mr. K.I. Sebastian vs Mr. Joseph Senson regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-26
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. K.I. Sebastian filed a suit against Mr. Joseph Senson for the realization of Rs. 69,008 which he claimed the defendant borrowed in 2014. The defendant denied the allegations, asserting that the suit is barred by limitation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by Mr. K.I. Sebastian for the realization of money, citing the case as barred by law of limitation. The defendant was awarded costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Costs of the proceedings awarded to the defendant
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was barred by limitation as it was instituted beyond the permissible time frame.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. K.I. Sebastian (56 years) CYM Office, Southern Railway, Irumpanam, Residing at Kannampuzha House, Makaliyam, Irumpanam, Cochin – 682 309

Defendants

Mr. Joseph Senson. V.A. (Age not specified years) Velluthamnnungal House, Chellanam.P.O., Maruvakkadu, Cochin – 682 008

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.69,008 from the defendant.
Evidence:
On an overall appreciation of facts and evidence in the case I have no hesitation to hold that plaintiff failed to prove that defendant borrowed Rs.50,000 from him on 16.04.2014, agreeing to repay the same on demand.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is entitled to get the costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, defendant is entitled to get the costs of the proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Pass Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of pass book of plaintiff with Canara bank, Eroor branch shows that Rs.50,000 is withdrawn on 16.04.2014 by cheque No.41706.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyers notice dated 01.03.2017 constitutes evidence of the demand for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgement Debt Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgement of debt card supports the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Plaintiff's oral evidence was presented in relation to the case.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/24/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases