Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 153/2022

Case between Mr. Chacko Varughese alias N.C.Varughese et al vs M/S. D.J.VISION et al regarding rent recovery

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-12-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Chacko Varughese and Christy J Varughese are the petitioners seeking to evict M/S. D.J.VISION and Mr. Dilu Joseph for non-payment of rent. The court found the respondents in arrears and allowed the eviction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction due to the respondents' failure to pay rent, totaling Rs. 4,95,240. The court found the petitions established their claims without rebuttal.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for eviction due to the respondents' failure to pay rent, totaling Rs. 4,95,240. The court found the petitions established their claims without rebuttal.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioner established their case with unrebutted evidence and clear defaults in rent payments.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petitioner established their case with unrebutted evidence and clear defaults in rent payments.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 and A6 established his case as pleaded by him. It shows that the rent is in arrears, and that respondent subletted the premises.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed under Section 11(2)(b), and 11(4)(iii) of the Act with costs as follows:- 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Chacko Varughese alias N.C.Varughese
Party Age
87
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Christy J Varughese
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S. D.J.VISION
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Dilu Joseph
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of power of attorney dated 04.05.2012, Original Lease Deed No.2030/2021, Original Lease Deed No.2026/2021, Copy of Legal notice dated 12.08.2022, Original acknowledgment card, Original postal receipt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Animon A. John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shan V. Shine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.S. Manu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.A. Anupaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.B Sivaprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.Y. Vijaykumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manju E.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anadhu Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Alint Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under Section 11(2)(b), and 11(4)(iii) of the Act.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the authority of the petitioner to represent the other petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original lease deed evidences the rental agreement between the petitioners and respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original lease deed evidences another rental agreement relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The copy of the legal notice requested the respondents to settle rent arrears and vacate the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original acknowledgment card is evidence related to the delivery of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original postal receipt is evidence of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mr. Chacko Varughese alias N.C.Varughese et al vs M/S. D.J.VISION et al regarding rent recovery
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Chacko Varughese alias N.C.Varughese et al vs M/S. D.J.VISION et al regarding rent recovery

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won