Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 63/2024

Case between Mr Biju Augustine vs Mrs Nawfiya J.N regarding rental arrears and possession

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-30
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr Biju Augustine, the petitioner, is seeking possession of rental property from Mrs Nawfiya J.N, the respondent, due to non-payment of rent and other dues. The respondent has failed to vacate the premises despite a notice and significant arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days and recognizing the petitioner's right to claim costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to vacate property and pay costs.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Evidence of arrears and lack of response from the respondent supported the petitioner's claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) of the Act as follows: 1.The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr Biju Augustine (51 years years) House No. 33/1704 P (46/2797­New), 'Biju Nivas', Vennala P.O, Kochi Pin 682028

Defendants

Mrs Nawfiya J.N (Age not specified years) C/o P.A Ashkar, 5/289, Kochuparambu, Mattancherry, Ernakulam, Kochi 682002

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) of the Act as follows: The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of rent agreement dated 10.12.2021 marked subject to proof. But since no foundation for secondary evidence was laid on, it was rejected.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 09.04.2024 marked in support of the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal receipts (2 nos) marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Unclaimed Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original unclaimed lawyer's notice by the respondent admitted and marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 12/10/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases