Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 79/2024

Case between Mr. A.M.Akbar vs M/s. Laege Mathrru Health Care Private Ltd et al regarding Rent Control

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. A.M.Akbar filed a rent control petition against M/s. Laege Mathrru Health Care Private Ltd and its directors. The petition was dismissed as not pressed since the respondent surrendered the building along with the key.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed because it was not pressed, as the respondents surrendered the building.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed because it was not pressed, as the respondents surrendered the building.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. A.M.Akbar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Laege Mathrru Health Care Private Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Sreekumar Rajashekharan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Sruthy Badran
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.S. Mohammed Usman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Priyadevi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arshad Ameen N.M.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed due to the respondent surrendering the building along with the key.
Evidence:
Since respondent surrendered the building along with key. Memo to that effect filed. Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court acknowledged the commission report which was filed as part of the proceedings.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. A.M.Akbar vs M/s. Laege Mathrru Health Care Private Ltd et al regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. A.M.Akbar vs M/s. Laege Mathrru Health Care Private Ltd et al regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Greeshma vs Shaija Saji regarding rent control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan vs Ms. Megha M.B. regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.G.Divakaran vs T.G.Mohanan regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Bose John vs SNA Oushadhasala Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Mathew Ninan et al vs Sujith P.S. et al regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won