Case Summary
M.P. Hajira and others filed a restoration petition against Anappadikkal Pathumakutty and others, seeking to allow the petition on payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition on payment of costs of Rs.3,000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the application on payment of costs.
The court allowed the application on payment of costs.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court allowed the application on payment of costs.
The court allowed the application on payment of costs.
Supporting Evidence
It is submitted that it is the 2nd application and can be allowed on costs.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I am inclined to allow the application on payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- For payment of costs. Cost paid. Hence IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.P.Hajira
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anappadikkal Muhammed Shafi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anappadikkal Shaharban
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Represented by 1st petitioner Hajira
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anapadikkal Jabir
- Party Age
- 16
- Relation
- Represented by 1st petitioner Hajira
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anappadikkal Jubairiya
- Party Age
- 13
- Relation
- Represented by 1st petitioner Hajira
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anappadikkal Pathumakutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.P.Ayishakutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nabeesa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anapadikkal Abdulsamad
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anapadikkal Salal
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anapadkiial Moosakutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anapadkkal Abdul Jaleel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.P.Khairunnnisa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.P.Naseema
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.P.Sumayya
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allow the restoration petition on payment of costs
Evidence:
Hence I am inclined to allow the application on payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- For payment of costs. Cost paid. Hence IA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.P.Hajira et al vs Anappadikkal Pathumakutty et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between M.P.Hajira et al vs Anappadikkal Pathumakutty et al regarding restoration petition