Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:116/2017

Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding offence under N.I. Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-08-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moideen. P filed a complaint against Abdu alleging an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant later sought permission to withdraw the complaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the complainant to withdraw his complaint and acquitted the accused. The bail bond of the accused was canceled, and he was set at liberty.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the complainant to withdraw his complaint and acquitted the accused. The bail bond of the accused was canceled, and he was set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint based on sufficient grounds.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint based on sufficient grounds.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complainant and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.

Judgment Evidence:

In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moideen. P
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdu
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.A Samad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.E.M Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.
Evidence:
the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
the accused is acquitted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding offence under N.I. Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sruthi Viswan. V.P et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Injunction Defendant Won