Case Summary
The complainant, Mohammed Kutty, accused Abdul Rasheed of a crime under the Negotiable Instrument Act. However, the complainant later sought permission to withdraw his complaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant was allowed to withdraw his complaint leading to the acquittal of the accused, Abdul Rasheed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohammed Kutty
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Rasheed
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T. Ali Hassan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Permission to withdraw the complaint.
Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complainant and having satisfied that here are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Kutty vs Abdul Rasheed regarding offense under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Kutty vs Abdul Rasheed regarding offense under N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act