Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T.No:160/2017

Case between Mohammed Kutty vs Abdul Rasheed regarding offence under N.I. Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
S Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-09-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohammed Kutty filed a complaint against Abdul Rasheed alleging an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant later sought permission to withdraw the complaint, which was granted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused, Abdul Rasheed, was acquitted after the complainant withdrew his complaint against him. The court found sufficient grounds to allow the withdrawal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Abdul Rasheed, was acquitted after the complainant withdrew his complaint against him. The court found sufficient grounds to allow the withdrawal.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complainant and having satisfied that here are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.

Judgment Evidence:

In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Kutty
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o Koya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Rasheed
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Saidalikutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. T. Ali Hassan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to withdraw the complaint.
Evidence:
the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Kutty vs Abdul Rasheed regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Kutty vs Abdul Rasheed regarding offence under N.I. Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Chandran vs Sasikala et al regarding cheque dishonour under Negotiable Instruments Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Musthafa vs Nazar Poozhikunnath regarding cheque dishonor
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won