Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 54 of 2023

Case between Miss Dr. Anu Chandran vs ESR Masters Finserve et al regarding monetary recovery

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Miss Dr. Anu Chandran, a doctor, is suing ESR Masters Finserve and others for the return of Rs. 4,48,000 that she invested based on the defendants' promises. The court found the defendants liable for the amount due to fraudulent inducement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 4,48,000 along with interest from the defendants due to non-repayment of the investment made by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs. 4,48,000 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum for the principal amount.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unrebutted evidence that supports her claims against the defendants, confirming their liability to return the invested amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs. 4,48,000 together with interest...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Miss Dr. Anu Chandran (37 years) Anuchandra Vilasom, Konathu Road, Adichanalloor P.O, Kollam 691 573

Defendants

ESR Masters Finserve (Age not specified years) 3rd Floor, Chakkarampilly Avenue, Sea Port Air Port Road, Kakkanad, Ernakulam 682021 Ebin Varghese (not known years) Sleeba House, MRRA 265, Moolepadam Road, Vazhakkala, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Pin 682030 Sreeranjini Allath (not known years) Sleeba House, MRRA 265, Moolepadam Road, Vazhakkala, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Pin 682030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs. 4,48,000/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs. 4,48,000/- (Rupees Four lakh Forty Eight thousand only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum...
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
B) The plaintiff is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the 2nd defendant for an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided details of financial transactions relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice demanding the return of the investment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the lawyer notice being returned.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases