Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1093/2020

Case between Midulal vs Rajesh regarding mediation settlement

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-25
Duration
Case Code No.
1093
Case Closed
Thu, 01/25/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Midulal and his wife Viji.V.V. are the plaintiffs against defendant Rajesh. The case involved a suit that was settled in mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. The mediation agreement will form part of the official decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of entire court fees paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. The mediation agreement will form part of the official decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the terms of mediation agreement are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Midulal
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Viji.V.V.
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.K. Harish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju.S. Poonthodathil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled for refund of entire court fees paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff entitled for refund of entire court fees paid.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/25/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P.S. Salahudheen vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding civil procedure settlement
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Satheesh Kumar V. M et al regarding mediation settlement
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Sarun.M.A et al regarding mediation settlement
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Wilson Xavier regarding mediation settlement
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. V.A. Antony vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding suit for declaration, injunction
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown