Case Summary
A restoration petition was filed by the petitioners seeking to restore a suit, which was allowed by the court on payment of costs of Rs 4000.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowance of restoration petition on payment of costs
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition was allowed on costs of Rs 4000, and the suit was restored.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed on costs of Rs 4000/-.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Meleveettil Sankarankutty Nair @ Kuttan Nair
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rugmini amma
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudheeer
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Priya
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shiji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chinakka Parambil Chathappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kali
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff / Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff / Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jayanthi Nediyodath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of suit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allowance of the restoration petition on payment of costs
Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed on costs of Rs 4000/-.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Meleveettil Sankarankutty Nair @ Kuttan Nair et al vs Chinakka Parambil Chathappan et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Meleveettil Sankarankutty Nair @ Kuttan Nair et al vs Chinakka Parambil Chathappan et al regarding restoration petition