Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1226/2022

Case between Mekha Johnson vs Devaji Rajendra Rao regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-14
Duration
approximately-2 years 7 months
Case Closed
Tue, 01/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mekha Johnson, is seeking payment of an outstanding amount from the defendant, Devaji Rajendra Rao, for stationery items purchased under a running account. Despite issuing notices, the defendant has not made the payments due, leading to this suit for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a sum of INR 85,873 along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 85,873/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a sum of INR 85,873 along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence tendered by the plaintiff remains uncontested and unrebutted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence tendered by the plaintiff remains uncontested and unrebutted.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence tendered by the plaintiff remains uncontested and unrebutted. There is nothing to disbelieve the evidence tendered by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 85,873/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till date of decree and thereafter with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the principal amount till the date of realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mekha Johnson
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Devaji Rajendra Rao
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Office copy of the Tax invoice No. A3/2019/20/0335, Office copy of the Tax invoice No. A3/2019-20/0341, Office copy of the Tax invoice No. A3/2019-20/0365, Office copy of the Tax invoice No. A3/2019-20/0379, Office copy of the Tax invoice No. A3/2019-20/0385, Office copy of the Tax invoice No. A3/2019-20/0385, Computer print out of the Statement of Account for the period from 01.04.2019 to 30.11.2022, Office copy of the Lawyer Notice, Returned Postal Envelope, Returned Postal Envelope
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Philip T. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas T. Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Achu Shubha Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jaisy T.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amala Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gayathri Vijayan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thahseem A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Derick Mathai Saji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sapna Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Urmila M.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Angel Mariya Biju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.C Sajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 85,873/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 85,873/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the authority of the plaintiff to file the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Office copy of the Tax invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice related to the sale of stationary items to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of the Tax invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice related to the sale of stationary items to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of the Tax invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice related to the sale of stationary items to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of the Tax invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice related to the sale of stationary items to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of the Tax invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice related to the sale of stationary items to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Computer print out of the Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account showing the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant for repayment of the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Envelope indicating the lawyer notice was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Envelope indicating the lawyer notice was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A9(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Mekha Johnson vs Devaji Rajendra Rao regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Mekha Johnson vs Devaji Rajendra Rao regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 06/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won