Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 220/2015

Case between Mary Varghese vs Siby et al regarding restoration petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-10 years 4 months
Case Code No.
220
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Mary Varghese seeking to restore a previous suit that was dismissed for default. The defendants raised objections to the restoration of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the restoration petition filed by Mary Varghese due to her failure to appear in court and the lack of sufficient reason to restore the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition filed by Mary Varghese due to her failure to appear in court and the lack of sufficient reason to restore the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide sufficient cause for the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide sufficient cause for the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The conduct of the plaintiff would show that she is not at all interested in taking any steps or adducing evidence in time.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is not allowable.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary Varghese
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siby
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lissy
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaya
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petition to restore the suit was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is not allowable.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Cancellation of partition deed
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Mon, 06/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sabu John regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Annamma M.J. vs James regarding Restoration Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Leelamany vs Reshmi Manjunadhan regarding Restoration Petition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Varhese K.M., et al vs Babykutty regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Lynumol T. N. vs Manoj A.D. regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won