Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 179/2022

Case between Varhese K.M., et al vs Babykutty regarding Restoration Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-04-10
Duration
Case Code No.
179
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners Varhese K.M. and others filed a restoration petition against the defendant Babykutty. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's absence and no representation. Consequently, the petition for restoration was not entertained.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's absence and no representation. Consequently, the petition for restoration was not entertained.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the petitioner absent and without representation, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found the petitioner absent and without representation, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Supporting Evidence
The court on the same day passed the following: O R D E R Petitioner is absent. No representation. No steps. Petition is dismissed for want of steps.

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner is absent. No representation. No steps. Petition is dismissed for want of steps.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varhese K.M.
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Elsamma Varghese
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Majeendran Thambi
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mahindran Thambi
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babykutty
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Remin Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sabu John regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Sarath Sajeevan et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Annamma M.J. vs James regarding Restoration Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Leelamany vs Reshmi Manjunadhan regarding Restoration Petition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Lynumol T. N. vs Manoj A.D. regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won