Case Summary
Leelamany filed a petition for restoration of the original suit against Reshmi Manjunadhan. The court found that there was no delay in the proceedings and decided to allow the restoration.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The suit is restored.
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the original suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed due to no delay in the proceedings.
The petition was allowed due to no delay in the proceedings.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petition would show that the party had not made any delay in the proceedings before the Court.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed. The suit is restored.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leelamany
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reshmi Manjunadhan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Archana R. Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.A. Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed. The suit is restored.
Evidence:
Considering the facts stated, the petition is allowed. The suit is restored.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022