Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 75 OF 1992

Case between Mariyakkutty Umma et al vs Moidu et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2018-12-06
Duration
26 years
Case Closed
Thu, 12/06/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mariyakkutty Umma and others filed a suit seeking perpetual injunction, but the suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and the counsel reported no instruction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking perpetual injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and no instruction from the counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking perpetual injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and no instruction from the counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mariyakkutty Umma
Party Age
50
Relation
Daughter of Oorothel Kunhammed Haji and wife of Oorothel Muhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed
Party Age
55
Relation
Husband of 1st plaintiff
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moidu
Party Age
30
Relation
Son of Oorothel Hydru
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Oorothel Muhammed kutty
Party Age
28
Relation
Son of Hydru
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Oorothel Basheer
Party Age
26
Relation
Son of Hydru
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thoombath Azhakkatt Mammathutti Umma
Party Age
55
Relation
Mother of D1 to 3
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A. Hariprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.C.Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Lilly Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff seeking perpetual injunction
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mariyakkutty Umma et al vs Moidu et al regarding perpetual injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mariyakkutty Umma et al vs Moidu et al regarding perpetual injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 12/06/1992 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 12/06/2018 - 12:00
From
Sat, 12/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Mon, 12/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kilar Mazhoor vs Thouseef et al regarding perpetual injunction of AIECT Campus
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Tharal Kulattu Karthiayani Amma's Children et al vs Asharaf regarding perpetual injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kalappurayil Santhi vs Vathsaladevi S. regarding perpetual injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shajan vs Kottuvayil Thottupurath Ramanunni's children et al regarding perpetual injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Cherada Kunhippocker et al vs Moideen's children et al regarding disputed right of way
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction Defendant Won