Case Summary
Plaintiff seeks injunction against defendants who trespassed into the property and interfered with running of AIECT Campus based on franchisee agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff granted perpetual injunction against defendants from trespassing and interfering with AIECT Campus.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved their case through cogent and reliable evidence left unchallenged as defendants remained ex-parte.
Plaintiff proved their case through cogent and reliable evidence left unchallenged as defendants remained ex-parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff adduced cogent and reliable evidence which remained unchallenged as defendants were ex-parte.
Judgment Evidence:
The defendants are restrained by a perpetual injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and interfering with the running of the institution named AIECT Campus.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kilar Mazhoor
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o. Ameeruddeen
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thouseef
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammadali
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jafar
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammad
Plaintiffs Documents
Registration Certificate, License Agreement, Police Petition, Registration Certificate, Letter of Authorization, Order issued Calicut University
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Ismayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Perpetual Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from trespassing and interfering with AIECT Campus
Evidence:
Plaintiff adduced cogent and reliable evidence left unchallenged as defendants remained ex-parte.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Registration Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show permission to occupy the plaint schedule property
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
License Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Detailed agreement terms
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Police Petition
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint filed against defendants
Reference:
A3
Document Type:
Registration Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show authorization to conduct institution
Reference:
A4
Document Type:
Letter of Authorization
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Achallya Technologies Private Limited
Reference:
A5
Document Type:
Order issued by Calicut University
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provisional sanction to conduct courses
Reference:
A6
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kilar Mazhoor vs Thouseef et al regarding perpetual injunction of AIECT Campus
Case Code Year
Case between Kilar Mazhoor vs Thouseef et al regarding perpetual injunction of AIECT Campus