Case Summary
Plaintiff Shajan filed a suit against defendants seeking perpetual injunction. However, the suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for perpetual injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed without cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shajan
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o Kunduvaravalappil Bharathan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kottuvayil Thottupurath Ramanunni's children
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anitha
- Party Age
- 51
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajitha
- Party Age
- 48
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shajan vs Kottuvayil Thottupurath Ramanunni's children et al regarding perpetual injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shajan vs Kottuvayil Thottupurath Ramanunni's children et al regarding perpetual injunction