Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 356 OF 2014

Case between Maniparambil Narayanan vs Maniparambil Ayyappan regarding Injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-29
Duration
5 years 1 month

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves plaintiff claiming right to use a way and take water from defendant's property. Defendant obstructed the plaintiff's use of the way. Court granted permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff granted permanent injunction against defendant. Defendant restrained from obstructing plaintiff's use of the way and taking water from defendant's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

The defendant and his men are restrained, by way of permanent prohibitory injunction, from causing any obstruction to the user of the way having an extent of 1.20 meter on extreme southern side of the defendant's property by the plaintiff and also restrained from taking water from the Well in the defendant's property by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Maniparambil Narayanan (66 Years years) Kanmanam amsom, desom and post, Tirur Taluk, 676 556

Defendants

Maniparambil Ayyappan (75 Years years) Kanmanam amsom, desom and post, Tirur Taluk, 676 556

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Perpetual injunction restraining obstruction to the user of the way
Evidence:
Plaintiff's claim supported by Exbt. C1 and C2 reports
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Perpetual injunction restraining construction of wall or fencing on defendant's property
Evidence:
Evidence of defendant's attempts to block the way

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's ownership of the plaint A schedule property
Reference:
Exbt. A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's ownership of way through the defendant's property
Reference:
Exbt. A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original ownership by their mother Valli
Reference:
Exbt. A3
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's documentation regarding property
Reference:
Exbt. B1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's property reference
Reference:
Exbt. B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on property inspection
Reference:
Exbt. C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch of the properties
Reference:
Exbt. C2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Subsequent property inspection report
Reference:
Exbt. C3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 10/24/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Individual

Similar Cases