Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Vinod Krishnan's son and Anil Kumar's son, have filed a suit against the defendants Narayanan kutty and others for injunction regarding the property that has been used as a water channel. The plaintiffs claim the property belongs to their family and the defendants sought to widen the channel, which the plaintiffs opposed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and their men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and widening the water channel by encroaching upon the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged evidence supporting their claim to the property.
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged evidence supporting their claim to the property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants and their men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and widening the water channel by encroaching upon the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Visanth (32 years years)
Edayur amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk
Binu (26 years years)
Edayur amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Narayanan kutty (60 years years)
Chettur House
Vijayaraghavan (60 years years)
Vattiyan Kavil House
Ayyappan (55 years years)
Parangattu Thodi House
Prajith.K. (42 years years)
Kunnath House
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants and their men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and widening the water channel.
Evidence:
the defendants and their men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction, from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and widening the water channel by encroaching upon the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the ownership of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court marked this document for reference during the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court marked this document for reference during the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C2