Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 304/2022

Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd vs Mr.Nadarajan regarding recovery of money

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 day
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd, represented by its Managing Director, who is seeking the recovery of a total of Rs. 1,07,975/- from the defendant, Mr. Nadarajan, due to dishonoured cheques for advertising services. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to the case being heard ex-parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 1,07,975/- along with future interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of Rs. 1,07,975/- with 9% future interest per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 1,07,975/- along with future interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.1,07,975/- ... 2. The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paulochan Maniamkot
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Nadarajan
Party Age
50
Relation
Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of resolution, Original cheque no.417369 of Rs. 82,688/-, True copy of Dishonour memo of ICICI Bank Ltd, Panampally nagar, Acknowledgment card, Lawyer notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.A.Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jayadeep Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jins P John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishnapriya P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs. 1,07,975/- with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 1,07,975/- with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: True copy of Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed to support the claims of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the payment attempted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: True copy of Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the cheque issued by the defendant was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides proof of communication regarding the matter.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence that the plaintiff sought to recover the amount owed.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd vs Mr.Nadarajan regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd vs Mr.Nadarajan regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 03/24/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won