Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 177/2024

Case between Majeeshkumar vs Suresh Ram P.A regarding eviction and rent arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-12-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Majeeshkumar, represented by Rema M.T., seeks eviction of Suresh Ram P.A for non-payment of rent and needs the property for his own occupation. The court found that the respondent failed to pay rent and allowed the petition for eviction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction based on the non-payment of rent and the bona fide need of the landlord for his own occupation of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved his case under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11 (3) of the Act with costs as follows: 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Majeeshkumar (48 years) Kunnathuveettil, Mayyanoor Amsam, Vadakara Taluk, Kozhikode District, Pin-673 107, Now residing at 46 Steep road, South Windsor, Connecticut, United States of America (USA) Rema M.T (65 years) Matheppilly House, Palluruthy South, Palluruthy P.O, Pin-682 006

Defendants

Suresh Ram P.A (47 years) Door No.9/22 A, Priyam, Pishari kovil Road Nair Samajam Junction, Eroor P.O, Pin-682 306, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11 (3) of the Act with costs.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner seeks recovery of possession of the property.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original power of attorney held by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Property tax receipt evidencing the ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice demanding payment of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Returned Envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original returned envelope with acknowledgment card evidencing non-receipt by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4 series

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases