Case Summary
Case involves a partition suit among the parties. Petitioner seeks final decree for partition of properties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
Final decree for partition passed in favor of the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Commissioner's report and plans found to be equitable.
Commissioner's report and plans found to be equitable.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Commissioner's report and plans found to be equitable.
Commissioner's report and plans found to be equitable.
Supporting Evidence
The Advocate Commissioner has effected division of property in tune with the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
Ext.C1 report and C2 plans shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Majeed
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o. Kalappattil Kunhimoideen Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deceased Kalappattil Kunhimoideen Haji's children
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- Rep. By Adiyattil Ahammedkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Preliminary decree
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Division of property according to shares
Reference:
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Report on division of property
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Division of property in Plans A, B, and C
Reference:
Ext.C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition and Property Division
Case Code
Case between Majeed vs Deceased Kalappattil Kunhimoideen Haji's children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Majeed vs Deceased Kalappattil Kunhimoideen Haji's children et al regarding partition