Case Summary
The case involves a restoration petition filed by Shyam Kumar to set aside an ex parte decree and judgment in the original suit. Both parties were absent during the hearing, and the petition was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition for default due to the absence of both parties and the petitioner's lack of interest in proceeding.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A M Sathyan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mallika
- Party Age
- 62
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A M Jancy
- Party Age
- 43
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A M Jawahar
- Party Age
- 40
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A M Biju
- Party Age
- 38
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyam Kumar
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T S Maya
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition filed under Order 9 Rule 13 was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A M Sathyan et al vs Shyam Kumar regarding Restoration Petition.
Case Code Year
Case between A M Sathyan et al vs Shyam Kumar regarding Restoration Petition.