Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 162/2025

Case between M. Radhakrishnan et al vs Gireesh Kumar et al regarding injunctive relief.

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are M. Radhakrishnan and Methale Purath Dharmajan seeking injunctive relief against the defendants Gireesh Kumar and Rajesh. The court granted an interim injunction based on the prima facie case established by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the interim injunction requested by the plaintiffs and made it absolute.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction made absolute.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the interim injunction requested by the plaintiffs and made it absolute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case and demonstrated irreparable hardship.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case and demonstrated irreparable hardship.
Supporting Evidence
Heard the counsel. The petition posted for counter and hearing ... I find that there will be irreparable hardship to the plaintiff if injuntion is not granted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the interim injuntion granted is made absolute.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M. Radhakrishnan
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Methale Purath Dharmajan
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gireesh Kumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P. Gangadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandeep Krishnan K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Govind K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The interim injunction granted is made absolute.
Evidence:
I find that there will be irreparable hardship to the plaintiff if injuntion is not granted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M. Radhakrishnan et al vs Gireesh Kumar et al regarding injunctive relief.
Case Code Year
Case between M. Radhakrishnan et al vs Gireesh Kumar et al regarding injunctive relief.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between 1.2 Rabbits Bakes & Cafe et al vs Nasla T.E. et al regarding ad-interim injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between CP Rasheed vs K Ahammed regarding permanent Order of Injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muraleedharan.T vs Rajan regarding Permanent prohibitory Injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won