Case Summary
This case involves Rabbits Bakes & Cafe as plaintiffs seeking an injunction against the defendants, who are obstructing their business operations. The court is addressing complaints regarding unlawful dispossession and interference with the café's business.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from dispossessing the petitioners from property
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim exparte injunction against the defendants, restraining them from dispossessing the plaintiffs from the property and interfering with their business. This decision was made to ensure the plaintiffs’ continued operation until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners have made out a prima facie case and the issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of the petition.
The petitioners have made out a prima facie case and the issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners have made out a prima facie case and the issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of the petition.
The petitioners have made out a prima facie case and the issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of the petition.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out a prima facie case and that issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of the petition.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I am inclined to grant an ad-interim exparte injunction restraining the defendants and their men from dispossessing the petitioners/plaintiffs from the petition schedule property...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rashid
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rashid K.V.
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Siddique K.E.
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nasla T.E.
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jinsha T.E.
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.E. Kunjabdulla
- Party Age
- 65
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, affidavit and documents submitted by plaintiffs.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P. Hashick
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim exparte injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the petitioners.
Evidence:
Hence I am inclined to grant an ad-interim exparte injunction restraining the defendants and their men from dispossessing the petitioners/plaintiffs from the petition schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate a prima facie case.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document filed to initiate the case.
Reference:
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The official order granting interim relief.
Reference:
IA 3/2025
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between 1.2 Rabbits Bakes & Cafe et al vs Nasla T.E. et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between 1.2 Rabbits Bakes & Cafe et al vs Nasla T.E. et al regarding ad-interim injunction