Case Summary
Partition suit filed by Leela and others against Krishnan and others where a final decree was passed based on terms of the compromise petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Partition decree
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Final decree passed based on the terms of a compromise petition in a partition suit.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief. Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
Final decree passed as per terms of Razi and compromise petition shall form part of final decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leela
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Wife of Vakkayil Paravannur Chandran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Swapna
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- Child of Vakkayil Paravannur Chandran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shyamjith
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shijith
- Party Age
- 19
- Relation
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krishnan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- Child of Vakkayil Paravannur Padmanabhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kalyani
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- Wife of Chathappunni
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appu
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gangadharan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathya
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- Wife of Haridasan
Plaintiffs Documents
IA 2365/18, IA 2345/18
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Lilly Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Irshad.K.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.K.Jayasankar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Nisha.P.G.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
Final decree passed based on the terms of a compromise petition in a partition suit.
Evidence:
Final decree passed as per terms of Razi and compromise petition shall form part of final decree.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
IA 2365/18
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Not mentioned
Reference:
Document Type:
IA 2345/18
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Not mentioned
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Leela et al vs Krishnan et al regarding Partition
Case Code Year
Case between Leela et al vs Krishnan et al regarding Partition