Original Suit No. 17 of 2016

Case between Chandran vs Kaniyaratharayil Ayyappan's children et al regarding partition

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2016-12-21

Duration

Not mentioned

Case Closed

Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chandran filed a suit against Kaniyaratharayil Ayyappan's children and others for partition. The court decreed the suit based on a lawful compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Partition decree

Case Type

Civil Suit - Partition

Final Judgment

The court decreed the suit and passed a final decree based on a lawful compromise agreement.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

As the terms of the compromise is lawful, suit is decreed and a final decree is passed on the terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Chandran
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o Ayyappan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kaniyaratharayil Ayyappan's children

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kaniyaratharayil Dineshan's wife
Party Age: 35

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kaniyaratharayil Dineshan's children

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Cherupurakkal Kumaran
Party Age: 72

Plaintiffs Documents

IA.2546/2016 - Compromise agreement

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. M.A. Ismail
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt. Sreekala Sudheesh
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition decree

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Decreed the suit and passed a final decree based on a lawful compromise agreement

Evidence:

As the terms of the compromise is lawful, suit is decreed and a final decree is passed on the terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Basis for the decree in the suit

Reference:

IA.2546/2016

Case Classification