Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 330 OF 2015

Case between Noorjahan vs Musthafa et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B.
Order Date
2017-08-10
Duration
2 years 11 months 12 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Noorjahan filed a suit for partition of property belonging to the legal heirs of her father, Avaran Haji, against multiple defendants claiming separate shares.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition by dividing the B schedule property among the parties by shares and allotted specific shares to each defendant along with detailing the allocation of certain property items.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of B schedule property with allotment of specific shares to each party
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Existence of documented evidence supporting the genealogical relationship between the parties and lack of objection from the plaintiff for specific allocations favored the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Refuse to allocate property in reserve has no basis at all as defendant No.1 has no right to claim the same.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Noorjahan (46 years) Kodalampallath House, Inkalam Post, Koorada, Thavanoor, Pin: 676 573

Defendants

Musthafa (53 years) Kalamban House, Edayoor Post, Pookkattiri, Valancheri, Tirur Taluk Suhara (50 years) Kalamban House, Edayoor Post, Pookkattiri, Valancheri, Tirur Taluk Summayya (46 years) Kakkokuzhiyil House, Melepeedika, Thekkankuttoor, Tirur Taluk Seenath (25 years) Cheethammu (68 years) Jameela (Age not specified years) Thondiyil House, Perimbilayi Post, Mannarkkad, Palakkad District Rukhiya (Age not specified years) Majida (18 years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of B schedule property with allotment of specific shares to each party
Evidence:
Existence of documented evidence supporting the genealogical relationship and lack of objection favored the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Panayam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved genealogical relationship
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Copy of Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved property ownership
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Ration Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of residence
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supported claims of residence in the property
Reference:
B7(a)-B8(e)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Detailed property information
Reference:
C1

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 08/10/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases