Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 330 OF 2015

Case between Noorjahan vs Musthafa et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B.
Order Date
2017-08-10
Duration
2 years 11 months 12 days
Case Closed
Thu, 08/10/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Noorjahan filed a suit for partition of property belonging to the legal heirs of her father, Avaran Haji, against multiple defendants claiming separate shares.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition by dividing the B schedule property among the parties by shares and allotted specific shares to each defendant along with detailing the allocation of certain property items.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of B schedule property with allotment of specific shares to each party
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit for partition by dividing the B schedule property among the parties by shares and allotted specific shares to each defendant along with detailing the allocation of certain property items.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Existence of documented evidence supporting the genealogical relationship between the parties and lack of objection from the plaintiff for specific allocations favored the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Existence of documented evidence supporting the genealogical relationship between the parties and lack of objection from the plaintiff for specific allocations favored the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
No evidence from the first defendant to prove his claim over the house as per reservation. The lack of proper evidence in favor of the defendant no.1 supported the court's decision to allocate property accordingly in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Refuse to allocate property in reserve has no basis at all as defendant No.1 has no right to claim the same.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Noorjahan
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o. Muhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Musthafa
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o. Kalamban Awaran Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suhara
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o.Kalamban Awaran Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Summayya
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o. Hamza, D/o.Kalamban Awaran Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seenath
Party Age
25
Relation
W/o. Subair, D/o.Kalamban Awaran Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cheethammu
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o.Kalamban Awaran Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jameela
Relation
W/o.Kalamban Moidutty, D/o. Hamza
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rukhiya
Relation
W/o. Kalamban Moidutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Majida
Party Age
18
Relation
D/o. Kalamban Moidutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Panayam Assignment Deed No. 868/1959, Copy of Jenm Assignment Deed No. 2758/1978, Ownership certificate, Cash receipt, Copy of Panayam Assignment deed No. 193/1991
Defendants Documents
Ration Card No. 2054127051, Building tax receipts, Arrear demand notices and receipts, Electricity bills, Account statement

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of B schedule property with allotment of specific shares to each party
Evidence:
Existence of documented evidence supporting the genealogical relationship and lack of objection favored the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Panayam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved genealogical relationship
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Copy of Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved property ownership
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Ration Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of residence
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supported claims of residence in the property
Reference:
B7(a)-B8(e)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Detailed property information
Reference:
C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Noorjahan vs Musthafa et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Noorjahan vs Musthafa et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 08/10/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/10/2017 - 12:00
From
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Valliyengal Kadar Haji's Children et al vs Alikkutty regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Chandran vs Kaniyaratharayil Ayyappan's children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Khadeeja vs Chakkalakkal Ahammed Haji's Children regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kadeeja et al vs Aboobacker et al regarding division of property for partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kadeeja et al vs Abdul Rahiman et al regarding Partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won