Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1087/2024

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding rent arrears and compliance of court orders.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Latha Murali filed a suit against Subaida P and others regarding non-payment of rent and compliance with court orders. The plaintiff failed to comply with the court's directive to pay rent arrears, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff failed to comply with the condition to pay rent arrears, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Latha Murali (56 years years) Flat no. 12C, Skyline 24 Karat – Jade, Puthukkalavattom road, Elamakkara, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 026

Defendants

Subaida P (62 years years) 8/865, Busthan House, Elambilad Desom, Kozhukkallur village, Koyilandi taluk, Iringath P.O, Kozhikode District – 673 523 Febin Hashim (43 years years) 35/1586A, Design Difference, Kaloor Desom, Poonithura village, Kanayannoor taluk, Palarivattom P.O, Ernakulam District – 682 025 Fymin Puliyenchalil (39 years years) 4/256, Thambu, Kaipamangalam Desom, Kodungallur taluk, Thrissur District – 680 681 Fasmin Puliyenchalil (35 years years) 8/865,Busthan House, Elambilad Desom, Kozhukkallur village, koyilandi taluk, Iringath P.O, Kozhikode District – 673 523

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to non-compliance with the court's order regarding rent arrears.
Evidence:
the plaintiff having failed to comply with the common order in IA 2/2024 and 5/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing the rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence as held by the Hon’ble High Court in the above decision. Therefore, the suit is only liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Sat, 01/06/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases