Case Summary
Lainumol T.N. is the plaintiff and Smitha Sibichan is the defendant. The case involves a mediation agreement that was heard and terms accepted by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund court fee as per rules.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on the lawful terms of the mediation agreement which forms part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement are lawful.
The terms of the mediation agreement are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement are lawful.
The terms of the mediation agreement are lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement are lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lainumol T.N.
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smitha Sibichan
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Haris K.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shaji K.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reni Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Mediation Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the mediation report that was filed.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023