Case Summary
K.V.Sathyapalan filed a petition to inspect records from O.S No. 68/2017 involving Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam. The petitioner claims the records are crucial for his case against the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as it did not conform to the required procedural rules. The petition lacked specificity regarding the documents sought for inspection.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Therefore, the present petition being not in conformity with Rule 119 of the Kerala Civil Rules of Practice and hence for the said reason, the petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.V.Sathyapalan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o late K.K.Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam
- Relation
- represented by its Secretary P.E.Rajeev
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C.M.Sobhanan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- President
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.E.Rajeev
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o Ittaman
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Babu Karukapadath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.U.Vinod Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A.Vaheeda Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arya Raghunath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vaisakhi V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Mushtaq T.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Wazim Babu Karukapadath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajwin P Lalson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Lakshmi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aysha E.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shifana Kaise
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Prem
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Gopimohanan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
To pass an order calling for the records of O.S No. 68/2017 from the Hon'ble Sub Court, Ernakulam for the purpose of inspection.
Evidence:
the present petition being not in conformity with Rule 119 of the Kerala Civil Rules of Practice and hence for the said reason, the petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Illegal suspension
Case Code
Case between K.V.Sathyapalan vs Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam et al regarding inspection of court records.
Case Code Year
Case between K.V.Sathyapalan vs Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam et al regarding inspection of court records.