Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 259 /2022

Case between Kuriyan Mathew et al vs M.S. Anil Kumar regarding injunction

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Kuriyan Mathew and George Johnson Cherian seeking an injunction against the defendant M.S. Anil Kumar. The matter was settled in mediation, and the mediation report was accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation agreement and decreed the suit in its terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation agreement and decreed the suit in its terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement was found to be lawful and accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation agreement was found to be lawful and accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of mediation agreement are found to be lawful and hence accepted and recorded here with.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kuriyan Mathew
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George Johnson Cherian
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.S. Anil Kumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aditya Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nikitha Susan Paulson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anwin Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ijas Muhammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Karol Mathews Sebastian Alencherry
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.S.Saji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is for injunction both mandatory and prohibitory.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kuriyan Mathew et al vs M.S. Anil Kumar regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kuriyan Mathew et al vs M.S. Anil Kumar regarding injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Santharam et al vs R. Ramesh et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between V. N Ranganathan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction and consequential relief
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jose John vs Golden Metro Apartment Owners Association et al regarding violations of association bylaws and waste collection
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding appointments of Chancellor & Finance Officer
The Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won