Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 137 of 2016

Case between Kunhimuhammed et al vs Suneer et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2016-11-29
Duration
Not mentioned
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought a perpetual injunction to prevent obstruction of their right of way by defendants on the plaintiff's property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted perpetual injunction to prevent defendants from interfering with their right of way on the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.

Judgment Evidence:

The defendants and their men are restrained by a perpetual injunction from trespassing into the plaint 'B' schedule property or to reduce the width of the plaint B schedule property or to make any obstruction to the plaintiff from using plaint B schedule property for passing and re-passing through plaint A schedule property with vehicular access.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunhimuhammed (49 years) Kooriparambil House, Thozhuvannor Amsom and Post, Karthala Desom, Meenpara, Tirur Taluk Kunhali (47 years) Pandal parambil House, Thozhuvannor Amsom and Post, Karthala Desom, Meenpara, Tirur Taluk Sulaiman Musliar (50 years) Ambaladath House, Thozhuvannor Amsom and Post, Karthala Desom, Meenpara, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Suneer (35 years) Peringaduthodi House, Thozhuvannor Amsom and Post, Karthala Desom, Meenpara, Tirur Taluk Shahul Hameed (35 years) Cholakkal House, Thozhuvannor Amsom and Post, Karthala Desom, Meenpara, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Prevent defendants from trespassing and obstructing plaintiffs' right of way
Evidence:
The defendants are restrained by a perpetual injunction...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Jenm Assignment Deeds
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved ownership of plaint A schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A1, Ext.A2, Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed payments related to the properties.
Reference:
Ext.A4 to A6
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reported on the boundaries of the plaint A schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided a visualization of the properties and way.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 11/09/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases