ORIGINAL SUIT No. 253 OF 2014

Case between Kunhimoideen vs Ali et al regarding Injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Nimmi.K.K., B.Sc, L.L.B., Munsiff

Order Date

2018-10-31

Duration

4 years

Case Closed

Wed, 10/31/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Kunhimoideen filed a suit for injunction against defendants. The court allowed an application and dismissed the suit as per terms of Razi.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Dismissal of the suit

Case Type

Civil Suit - Injunction

Final Judgment

The court allowed an application and dismissed the suit as per terms of Razi.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 2036/2018 is hereby allowed and suit is dismissed as per terms of Razi.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kunhimoideen
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o Entheen Haji

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ali
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o Saidalavi

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hamza
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o Muhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Basheer
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o K.P.Moideen

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kondoparambil Moideen's wife Kadeeja et al

Plaintiffs Documents

IA 2036/2018

Defendants Documents

IA 2250/15, 2551/15, 198/16, 199/16, 1276/16, 1277/16

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.A.Samad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Dismissal of the suit

Description:

Plaintiff's suit for injunction dismissed

Evidence: