Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:48/2018

Case between Kunheen vs Reghunath regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-08-05
Duration
null
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a complaint filed by Kunheen against Reghunath for an alleged offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused pleaded not guilty and the case eventually was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absences.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the complaint on the grounds of the complainant's absence during multiple hearings. It was determined that the complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the complaint on the grounds of the complainant's absence during multiple hearings. It was determined that the complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the case.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to present evidence and attend court proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant failed to present evidence and attend court proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has been given several opportunities for adducing evidence. But, he remains absent on all these days and failed to obey the directions given by the Court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunheen
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reghunath
Party Age
48
Relation
null
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Dismissal of the complaint due to the complainant's absences and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Kunheen vs Reghunath regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Kunheen vs Reghunath regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Musthafa vs Nazar Poozhikunnath regarding cheque dishonor
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Shaijal Babu vs Abdul Razak. T.K regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between M. Abdulkhader Haji vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won