Case Summary
Petitioners filed a case seeking permission to sue as paupers due to damages caused by respondents to their property, including destruction of valuable items and a scooter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to sue as paupers
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition filed by the petitioners seeking to sue as paupers.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated the lack of financial capacity to pay court fees and presented evidence supporting their indigent status.
The petitioner demonstrated the lack of financial capacity to pay court fees and presented evidence supporting their indigent status.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated the lack of financial capacity to pay court fees and presented evidence supporting their indigent status.
The petitioner demonstrated the lack of financial capacity to pay court fees and presented evidence supporting their indigent status.
Supporting Evidence
According to the petitioner the petitioners have no properties except the movable and immovable properties mentioned in the petition.
Judgment Evidence:
"In the result the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint."
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhava
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shoukkathali
- Party Age
- 25
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathar
- Party Age
- 25
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faizal
- Party Age
- 24
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Farshad
- Party Age
- 24
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Marshad
- Party Age
- 24
Plaintiffs Documents
Chief affidavit filed
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permission to sue as paupers
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Request for permission to sue without paying court fees due to financial inability.
Evidence:
According to the petitioner the petitioners have no properties except the movable and immovable properties mentioned in the petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Chief Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed as evidence in lieu of examination in chief.
Reference:
Document Type:
Report
Submitted By:
Third party
Relevance:
Report from AGP dated 9-2-2018.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Compensation and Damages
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Damages to property
Case Code
Case between Kunhava et al vs Shoukkathali et al regarding property damage
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhava et al vs Shoukkathali et al regarding property damage