Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1066/2022

Case between N.A.Mohammedkutty vs Nationalist Congress Party et al regarding illegal expulsion from party

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-15
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months
Case Closed
Fri, 03/15/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N.A.Mohammedkutty is the plaintiff who claims he was illegally expelled from the Nationalist Congress Party without following proper procedures. The defendants, including the party and its various officials, did not respond to the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the expulsion of the plaintiff was illegal and issued a permanent injunction against the enforcement of the expulsion order. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration that the expulsion was illegal and a permanent prohibitory injunction against expulsion enforcement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the expulsion of the plaintiff was illegal and issued a permanent injunction against the enforcement of the expulsion order. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and satisfactorily proved the claims made in the plaint.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and satisfactorily proved the claims made in the plaint.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The suit is decreed by a declaration that the expulsion of the plaintiff vide order dated 18.10.2022 as illegal, in violation of the constitution and byelaws of the 1st defendant party. 2. The suit is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction directing the defendants from enforcing the order dated 18.10.2022 by expelling the plaintiff from the party or preventing the plaintiff from exercising his rights as a member.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.A.Mohammedkutty
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Nationalist Congress Party
Relation
represented by its National President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Central Action and Disciplinary Committee of the Nationalist Congress Party
Relation
represented by its Chairman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Nationalist Congress Party
Relation
represented by its State President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The National Congress Party, District Committee, Ernakulam
Relation
represented by its President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Praful Patel M.P
Relation
National Vice President – NCP
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of Rules of Nationalist congress, Photocopy of the plaintiff letter to Mr.Sharad Pawar, National President, NCP, Photocopy of the plaintiffs representation to National Election Authority Mr.Peethambaran Master, Photocopy of the plaintiffs representation to the State Election Authority, Photocopy of plaintiffs email representation to National President Mr.Sharad Pawar, Photocopy of the office order issued by the 2nd defendant, Original letter from Ajith Pawar National President of NCP.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Sanjai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Parvathi Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kiran Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prasoon Sunny Rahul Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.K.Dheerandra Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Feroze D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jiyas C.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishnendu T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Preethi S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reji George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manju Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sai Sankar S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aayshath Najila Schemnau
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that the expulsion of the plaintiff is illegal.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed by a declaration that the expulsion of the plaintiff vide order dated 18.10.2022 as illegal.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Preventing the defendants from expelling the plaintiff or preventing participation in party activities.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction directing the defendants from enforcing the order dated 18.10.2022.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Photocopy of Rules of Nationalist congress
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Mentioned as evidence of the party rules.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Photocopy of the plaintiff letter to Mr.Sharad Pawar, National President, NCP
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as part of the plaintiff's representation.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Photocopy of the plaintiffs representation to National Election Authority Mr.Peethambaran Master
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as evidence of the plaintiff's complaints.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Photocopy of the plaintiffs representation to the State Election Authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Included in the plaintiff's submissions to demonstrate adherence to process.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photocopy of plaintiffs email representation to National President Mr.Sharad Pawar
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence regarding communication with party leadership.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Photocopy of the office order issued by the 2nd defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Critical in demonstrating the basis of the plaintiff's expulsion.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original letter from Ajith Pawar National President of NCP
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as important evidence in the plaintiff's defense.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Violation of lease conditions
Case Code
Case between N.A.Mohammedkutty vs Nationalist Congress Party et al regarding illegal expulsion from party
Case Code Year
Case between N.A.Mohammedkutty vs Nationalist Congress Party et al regarding illegal expulsion from party

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 10/18/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/15/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Political Party

Similar Cases

Case between K.A. Thankappan vs Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha KPMS et al regarding declaration of Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sudheesh Kumar S et al vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between A.M. Shukur vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit.
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Nationalist Congress Party vs Mr. Roy Varicatt regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binu E B vs Treesa Mary T M regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won