Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 400/2024

Case between M/s Nationalist Congress Party vs Mr. Roy Varicatt regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-11-01
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the Nationalist Congress Party represented by its State President, Mr. N. A Muhammed Kutty, against Mr. Roy Varicatt. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from misrepresenting himself as the State President of the party and using its symbols and flag, which has caused public confusion.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, preventing him from acting as an office bearer of the Nationalist Congress Party and using its symbols.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant from posing as an office bearer of the Nationalist Congress Party and using the party's flag and election symbol.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved that the defendant had no legal authority to represent the party and was infringing upon its rights.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant, his men, servants, agents or persons claiming under him from posing as office bearer of the Nationalist Congress Party and restraining the defendant from using the flag and election symbol as well as stationary of the plaintiff, except as per due process of law.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Nationalist Congress Party (Age not specified years) 79-81, North Avenue, New Delhi -110001 Mr. N. A Muhammed Kutty (64 years) Blossoms, Nialakam Kara, Thrikkakara North village, Kanayannur Taluk, Cochin University P.O, Cochin- 682022

Defendants

Mr. Roy Varicatt (67 years) Varicatt House, Orange Villa, Karikode Village, Thodupuzha Taluk, Thodupuzha East P.O, Idukki - 685585

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from posing as an office bearer and using party symbols.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant, his men, servants, agents or persons claiming under him from posing as office bearer of the Nationalist Congress Party and restraining the defendant from using the flag and election symbol as well as stationary of the plaintiff, except as per due process of law.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the authority of PW1 to represent the plaintiff party.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the authority of PW1 to represent the plaintiff party.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the authority of PW1 to represent the plaintiff party.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the authority of PW1 to represent the plaintiff party.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to the claims of authority.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to the claims of authority.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to the claims of authority.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: News report in Kerala Kaumudi Daily
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the illegal actions of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: News report in Madhyamam Daily
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the illegal actions of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of complaint filed before CI of Police, East Fort Police Station, Thrissur
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the plaintiff's complaints regarding the defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Copy of complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the plaintiff's complaints regarding the defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Copy of complaint sent to the Thrissur District Police Chief and the DGP Kerala
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the plaintiff's complaints regarding the defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: News report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to the claims of injury to the party's reputation.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: News report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to the claims of injury to the party's reputation.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Political Party

Similar Cases