Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
S.T. No:91/2017

Case between Kunhahammed. T.K vs T. Premkumar regarding offence under section 138 of N.I. Act

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan, B.Com.,LL.B, LLM
Order Date
2019-09-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a complaint filed by Kunhahammed. T.K against T. Premkumar for an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the dishonor of cheques issued by the accused. The accused is alleged to have borrowed money and issued cheques that bounced due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused was found not guilty of the charges under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was acquitted. The court determined that the complainant failed to prove the case against the accused.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the complainant failed to prove the evidence regarding the execution of the cheques and the debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, accused is acquitted under S. 255 (1) Criminal Procedure Code for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunhahammed. T.K (72 years years) Thaikkalathil, Athavanad Amsom Desom, Karippol. P.O, Tirur

Defendants

T. Premkumar (55 years years) Pookunnu Desom, Mannarkkad -1

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused to the complainant towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused to the complainant towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo issued by the bank indicating that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice sent to the accused regarding dishonour of cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt for the lawyer notice sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card evidencing receipt of the lawyer notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo issued by the bank indicating that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice sent to the accused regarding dishonour of cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt for the lawyer notice sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P9
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card evidencing receipt of the lawyer notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P10

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases