Case Summary
K.R Lalitha is the decree holder, while the State of Kerala and the Tahasildar Kanayannur Taluk are the judgment debtors. The petition has been reported settled and closed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
E.P
Final Judgment
No
The matter has been reported settled as per the court's order. The execution petition has been closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder was present and reported a settlement.
The decree holder was present and reported a settlement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder was present and reported a settlement.
The decree holder was present and reported a settlement.
Supporting Evidence
The decree Holder represented. Matter reported settled.
Judgment Evidence:
Matter reported settled. E.P reported settled. Closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.R Lalitha
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The State of Kerala
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Tahasildar Kanayannur Taluk
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Raju V Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. V Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T. A George Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
E.P
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.SNO.
Case Code Year
2008
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement