Case Summary
Petitioner filed a restoration petition against the respondent with a chance given to contest the matter and obtain a decree on merit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of application
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition with a chance for the respondent to contest the matter on payment of costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
No proper reason for their non-filing of the application within the specified period was stated. The petition was allowed on terms of Rs.2500.
Judgment Evidence:
IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kokkaranhikkal Kabeer
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Parambil Mustafa
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V. Chandrashekaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Parambil Mustafa
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of application
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the application allowed with costs.
Evidence:
IA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kokkaranhikkal Kabeer vs Parambil Mustafa regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Kokkaranhikkal Kabeer vs Parambil Mustafa regarding restoration petition