Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 53/2024

Case between K.N. Sreenivasan vs M/s Royal Travancore Farmers Producer Company Limited et al regarding lease and rent control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-03-05
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.N. Sreenivasan, the petitioner, seeks relief against M/s Royal Travancore Farmers Producer Company Limited and its CEO for defaulting on rent payments for leased premises. The petitioner requires the property for his unemployed daughter's tuition center.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to vacate the leased property and put the petitioner in possession within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner to be put in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to vacate the leased property and put the petitioner in possession within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted evidence confirmed the petitioner's claims of unpaid rent and the need for the premises.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted evidence confirmed the petitioner's claims of unpaid rent and the need for the premises.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A7 established his case as pleaded by him. It shows that the rent is in arrears. The bonafide need for starting a tuition center for the daughter of the petitioner was also projected by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- 1.The respondents/tenants are directed to put the landlord/ petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.N. Sreenivasan
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Royal Travancore Farmers Producer Company Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh R.
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer's notice dated 21.12.2023, Postal receipts, Acknowledgment cards, Returned postal envelope
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathai K.C.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is granted possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondents/tenants are directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to recover costs of the petition from the respondents.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish that the petitioner issued a legal notice to the respondents regarding unpaid rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt demonstrates that the lawyer's notice was sent and received.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These acknowledgment cards serve as proof that the first respondent received the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3 and A4
Document Type: Postal Envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The returned postal envelope indicates that the second respondent refused to accept the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts are used to verify the ownership and assessment of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6 and A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between K.N. Sreenivasan vs M/s Royal Travancore Farmers Producer Company Limited et al regarding lease and rent control
Case Code Year
Case between K.N. Sreenivasan vs M/s Royal Travancore Farmers Producer Company Limited et al regarding lease and rent control

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 11/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won