Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 536/2024

Case between K.M Devarajan vs Raji @ Sindarlla @ Maya Sunny et al regarding recovery of money based on a cheque.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.M Devarajan, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Raji @ Sindarlla @ Maya Sunny and Sunny @ Peterson K P, the defendants, for recovery of a loan amounting to ₹3,00,000. The cheque issued by the first defendant was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹3,00,000 along with interest at 6% per annum. The court found that the evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff ₹3,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹3,00,000 along with interest at 6% per annum. The court found that the evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established that the defendants obtained money and issued a cheque, which was subsequently dishonoured.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established that the defendants obtained money and issued a cheque, which was subsequently dishonoured.
Supporting Evidence
Evidently, the first defendant had issued a cheque and the said cheque had been dishonoured. The evidence of PW1 remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: i. The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants or from assets of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.M Devarajan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raji @ Sindarlla @ Maya Sunny
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunny @ Peterson K P
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No. 406632, Cheque Return Memo, Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipts (2 Nos.), Copy of Notice issued by Cheranelloor Police Station, Certified copy of Judgment in WP(c) No. 22562/2024 of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. A Martin Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nithya K.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reghunath Naduveettil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jinu Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 3,00,000/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
It is answered that the plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 3,00,000/- from the defendants.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest on the recovered amount at the rate of 6% per annum.
Evidence:
I am also of the opinion that fixing the rate of interest at 6% per annum (simple interest) will suffice interest of justice.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued by the first defendant towards discharge of liability to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicated that the cheque issued by the first defendant was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A notice sent to the first defendant regarding the dishonour of the cheque and demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts related to the notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of the notice issued by the Cheranelloor Police Station.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is relevant as it supports the plaintiff's case in the current proceeding.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between K.M Devarajan vs Raji @ Sindarlla @ Maya Sunny et al regarding recovery of money based on a cheque.
Case Code Year
Case between K.M Devarajan vs Raji @ Sindarlla @ Maya Sunny et al regarding recovery of money based on a cheque.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/19/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sherin Neauman P.S vs Bijitha Johnson regarding return of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Prasad V C vs Reshma K Nair regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunny Abraham vs Rijo E C et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Eldho Olickal vs Madhu regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Wallmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. vs Venugopal regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won