Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 637/2023

Case between Sherin Neauman P.S vs Bijitha Johnson regarding return of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-24
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sherin Neauman P.S is the plaintiff who lent ₹5,54,000 to Bijitha Johnson, the defendant, for personal needs. When the defendant's cheque for repayment was dishonored due to insufficient funds, the plaintiff pursued legal action to recover the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to pay ₹7,47,000 with interest for the dishonored cheque. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount and costs from the defendant's assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of ₹7,47,000 with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 7,47,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Forty Seven Thousand Only) with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sherin Neauman P.S (42 years years) Pottakkattil house, Chottanikkara P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 312

Defendants

Bijitha Johnson (28 years years) Mariyalayam house, Vettickal P.O, Thuppampady, Mulanthuruthy village, Ernakulam District – 682 314

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover an amount of ₹7,47,000 along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 7,47,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Forty Seven Thousand Only) with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued by the defendant for repayment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of the dishonor memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The memo confirmed that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of the legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice was sent to the defendant after the cheque was dishonored.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of the postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt serves as proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of the A/D card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The A/D card confirms the receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 09/07/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases